Life and Death.

I defend a definition of death applicable to organisms, and their relevant proper parts, accommodating the possibility that such entities, when in a state of suspended animation, are bereft of life-processes, but not dead. Further, I defend a definition of life, utilizing the notion of a goal-direct...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Monist Vol. 98; no. 3; pp. 303 - 318
Autor principal: Rosenkrantz, Gary S.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Sep2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=110246074&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 110246074
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00269662
        MST
      jtl: Monist
      issn: 00269662
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2015
      vid: 98
      iid: 3
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        110246074
        10.1093/monist/onv011
      ppf: 303
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 554KB
      tig:
        atl: Life and Death.
      aug:
        au: Rosenkrantz, Gary S.
        affil: University of North Carolina, Greensboro
      su:
        Death
        Life
        Philosophy
        Ontology
        Organisms
      sug:
        subj:
          Death
          Life
          Philosophy
          Ontology
          Organisms
      ab: I defend a definition of death applicable to organisms, and their relevant proper parts, accommodating the possibility that such entities, when in a state of suspended animation, are bereft of life-processes, but not dead. Further, I defend a definition of life, utilizing the notion of a goal-directed metabolic, reproductive, or psychological activity, that can accommodate living things of any possible natural kind or ontological category, e.g., living organisms (whether carbon-based or otherwise), their living cells, living persons of any metaphysically possible sort, such as living humans, reflective androids, and nonphysical souls. I remain neutral about whether instances of such natural kinds would necessarily instantiate them and about whether goal-directedness of the aforementioned kind is reducible to natural selection and inheritance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 Hegeler Institute.
      item: Monist
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2015
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N