NETWORKS AND HIERARCHIES: TWO WAYS OF THINKING.
The main motive of the 20th century continental philosophy was criticism of metaphysics. Previous philosophical systems were considered too rigid; there was a search for a way out from metaphysical hierarchical way of thinking. Using the synthesis of the history of religions and philosophy, this pap...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 88; pp. 114 - 130 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2015
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=110259085&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 110259085 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2015 vid: 88 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 110259085 ppf: 114 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.8MB tig: atl: NETWORKS AND HIERARCHIES: TWO WAYS OF THINKING. aug: au: Moor, Argo Luks, Leo affil: Institute of Economics and Social Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 1a, 51014 Tartu, Estonia su: Hierarchical Bayes model Thought & thinking Continental philosophy Metaphysics Animism Motivation (Psychology) sug: subj: Hierarchical Bayes model Thought & thinking Continental philosophy Metaphysics Animism Motivation (Psychology) keyword: 20th century philosophy animism hierarchical thinking history of religions network thinking animizmas hierarchinis mąstymas religijų istorija tinklinis mąstymas XX a. filosofija ab: The main motive of the 20th century continental philosophy was criticism of metaphysics. Previous philosophical systems were considered too rigid; there was a search for a way out from metaphysical hierarchical way of thinking. Using the synthesis of the history of religions and philosophy, this paper claims that many surprising similarities can be found between animism and the lines of thought of the 20th century philosophy. The paper analyses the differences between network thinking and hierarchical thinking. Network thinking is analysed through two motives: multidimensionality and the network of shared souls. Animism is used as a major example to describe the impact of motives to thinking and practices. The rise and spread of hierarchical thinking is also described. Pagrindinis XX a. kontinentinės filosofijos motyvas buvo metafizikos kritika. Ankstesnės filosofinės sistemos buvo imtos laikyti pernelyg stingios, imta ieškoti būdų išvengti metafizinio hierarchinio mąstymo. Pasitelkiant religijų ir filosofijos istorijos sintezę, šiame straipsnyje teigiama, jog įmanoma aptikti gausybę stulbinančių panašumų tarp animizmo ir XX a. filosofinio mąstymo. Straipsnyje aptariami skirtumai tarp tinklinio mąstymo ir hierarchinio mąstymo. Tinklinis mąstymas analizuojamas pasitelkiant du motyvus: daugiadimensiškumą ir bendrųjų sielų tinklą. Animizmas naudojamas kaip pagrindinis pavyzdys nusakant motyvų reikšmę mąstymui ir praktikai. Taip pat aprašomas hierarchinio mąstymo atsiradimas ir sklaida. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2015 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|