Dimensions, discourses and differences: trainees conceptualising health care leadership and followership.

Context As doctors in all specialties are expected to undertake leadership within health care organisations, leadership development has become an inherent part of medical education. Whereas the leadership literature within medical education remains mostly focused on individual, hierarchical leadersh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Education Vol. 49; no. 12; pp. 1248 - 1263
Autores principales: Gordon, Lisi J, Rees, Charlotte E, Ker, Jean S, Cleland, Jennifer
Formato: glossary research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2015
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=111238813&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 111238813
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03080110
        ESF
      jtl: Medical Education
      issn: 03080110
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2015
      vid: 49
      iid: 12
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        111238813
        111238813
        111238813
        10.1111/medu.12832
        111238813
      ppf: 1248
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Dimensions, discourses and differences: trainees conceptualising health care leadership and followership.
      aug:
        au:
          Gordon, Lisi J
          Rees, Charlotte E
          Ker, Jean S
          Cleland, Jennifer
        affil: Medical Education Institute, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Leadership Education
          Student Attitudes
          Education, Medical Psychosocial Factors
          Social Constructionism
          Qualitative Studies
          Students, Medical United Kingdom
          Semi-Structured Interview
          United Kingdom
          Audiorecording
          Thematic Analysis
          Discourse Analysis
          Personality
          Personal Values
          Skill Mix
          Accountability
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Multicenter Studies United Kingdom
          Students, Medical
          Adult
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Context As doctors in all specialties are expected to undertake leadership within health care organisations, leadership development has become an inherent part of medical education. Whereas the leadership literature within medical education remains mostly focused on individual, hierarchical leadership, contemporary theory posits leadership as a group process, which should be distributed across all levels of health care organisation. This gap between theory and practice indicates that there is a need to understand what leadership and followership mean to medical trainees working in today's interprofessional health care workplace. Methods Epistemologically grounded in social constructionism, this research involved 19 individual and 11 group interviews with 65 UK medical trainees across all stages of training and a range of specialties. Semi-structured interviewing techniques were employed to capture medical trainees' conceptualisations of leadership and followership. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic framework analysis to identify leadership and followership dimensions which were subsequently mapped onto leadership discourses found in the literature. Results Although diversity existed in terms of medical trainees' understandings of leadership and followership, unsophisticated conceptualisations focusing on individual behaviours, hierarchy and personality were commonplace in trainees' understandings. This indicated the dominance of an individualist discourse. Patterns in understandings across all stages of training and specialties, and whether definitions were solicited or unsolicited, illustrated that context heavily influenced trainees' conceptualisations of leadership and followership. Conclusions Our findings suggest that UK trainees typically hold traditional understandings of leadership and followership, which are clearly influenced by the organisational structures in which they work. Although education may change these understandings to some extent, changes in leadership practices to reflect contemporary theory are unlikely to be sustained if leadership experiences in the workplace continue to be based on individualist models.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        glossary
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N