No effect on QT intervals of mipomersen, a 2′- O-methoxyethyl modified antisense oligonucleotide targeting ApoB-100 mRNA, in a phase I dose escalation placebo-controlled study, and confirmed by a thorough QT (tQT) study, in healthy subjects.

Purpose: The aim of this study to evaluate the effect of mipomersen on QT intervals in a phase I dose escalation, placebo-controlled study, and a thorough QT (tQT) study in healthy subjects. Methods: In the initial phase I study, 29 healthy subjects received either single or multiple (for 4 weeks) a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Vol. 72; no. 3; pp. 267 - 276
Autores principales: Yu, Rosie, Gunawan, Rudy, Li, Zhaoyang, Mittleman, Robert, Mahmood, Asif, Grundy, John, Singleton, Walter, Geary, Richard, Wang, Yanfeng
Formato: clinical trial equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2016
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: The aim of this study to evaluate the effect of mipomersen on QT intervals in a phase I dose escalation, placebo-controlled study, and a thorough QT (tQT) study in healthy subjects. Methods: In the initial phase I study, 29 healthy subjects received either single or multiple (for 4 weeks) ascending doses of mipomersen (50-400 mg) administered subcutaneously (SC) or via a 2-h intravenous (IV) infusion, and 7 subjects received placebo. In the confirmative tQT study, 58 healthy subjects received placebo, 400 mg IV moxifloxacin, 200 mg SC, or 200 mg IV of mipomersen in a double-blind, 4-way crossover design with a minimum 5-day washout between treatments. ECG measurements were performed at baseline and selected time points (including T). The correlation between QTcF intervals corrected for baseline and time-matched placebo when available with PK plasma exposure was evaluated by linear regression analysis. Results: In the phase I study, no positive correlation between the PK exposure and ∆QTcF or ∆∆QTcF was observed within the wide dose or exposure range tested. Similar results were observed in the tQT study, where the predicted ΔΔQTcF and its upper bound of the 90 % CI at C of therapeutic and supratherapeutic dose were approximately −1.7 and 2.9 ms, respectively. Conclusions: Mipomersen showed no effect on QT intervals in both the phase I dose escalation study and the tQT study. These results support the proposal that QT assessment can be made in a phase I dose escalation study, and no tQT study may be necessary if the phase I dose escalation study showed a negative QT effect.