A New Light on Non-deductive Argumentation Schemes.
T. Govier‘s description of ‘conductive argument‘ and ‘A priori analogy‘ is taken as a start to investigate non-deductive argumentation. It is here argued, that the nature of those types can be better understood when taking up a dynamic view (in addition to the usual structural view). The concepts of...
| Publicado en: | Argumentation Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 341 - 351 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Aug1998
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=11307106&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 11307106 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0920427X L8J jtl: Argumentation issn: 0920427X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug1998 vid: 12 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 11307106 10.1023/A:1007791211241 ppf: 341 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: A New Light on Non-deductive Argumentation Schemes. aug: au: Wohlrapp, Harald affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Hamburg, Germany su: Debate Inference (Logic) sug: subj: Debate Inference (Logic) keyword: A priori analogy conductive argument dynamics of argumentaton frame position ab: T. Govier‘s description of ‘conductive argument‘ and ‘A priori analogy‘ is taken as a start to investigate non-deductive argumentation. It is here argued, that the nature of those types can be better understood when taking up a dynamic view (in addition to the usual structural view). The concepts of ‘frame‘ and ‘position‘ are constructed in order to establish such a twofold approach. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1998 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|