A New Light on Non-deductive Argumentation Schemes.
T. Govier‘s description of ‘conductive argument‘ and ‘A priori analogy‘ is taken as a start to investigate non-deductive argumentation. It is here argued, that the nature of those types can be better understood when taking up a dynamic view (in addition to the usual structural view). The concepts of...
| Published in: | Argumentation Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 341 - 351 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Aug1998
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| Summary: | T. Govier‘s description of ‘conductive argument‘ and ‘A priori analogy‘ is taken as a start to investigate non-deductive argumentation. It is here argued, that the nature of those types can be better understood when taking up a dynamic view (in addition to the usual structural view). The concepts of ‘frame‘ and ‘position‘ are constructed in order to establish such a twofold approach. |
|---|