Cognitive factors affecting children’s nonsymbolic and symbolic magnitude judgment abilities: A latent profile analysis.

Early math abilities are claimed to be linked to magnitude representation ability. Some claim that nonsymbolic magnitude abilities scaffold the acquisition of symbolic (Arabic number) magnitude abilities and influence math ability. Others claim that symbolic magnitude abilities, and ipso facto math...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Vol. 152; pp. 173 - 192
Autores principales: Chew, Cindy S., Forte, Jason D., Reeve, Robert A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. Dec2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=118499050&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 118499050
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00220965
        JEX
      jtl: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
      issn: 00220965
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2016
      vid: 152
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        118499050
        10.1016/j.jecp.2016.07.001
      ppf: 173
      ppct: 19
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Cognitive factors affecting children’s nonsymbolic and symbolic magnitude judgment abilities: A latent profile analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Chew, Cindy S.
          Forte, Jason D.
          Reeve, Robert A.
        affil: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia
      su:
        Judgment (Psychology)
        Children
        Cognition
        Latent class analysis (Statistics)
        Arabic numeration
        Magnitude (Mathematics)
      sug:
        subj:
          Judgment (Psychology)
          Children
          Cognition
          Latent class analysis (Statistics)
          Arabic numeration
          Magnitude (Mathematics)
      keyword:
        Latent profile analysis
        Magnitude representation
        Math ability differences
        Nonsymbolic and symbolic ability patterns
        Number naming ability
        Visuospatial working memory
        Latent profile analysis
        Magnitude representation
        Math ability differences
        Nonsymbolic and symbolic ability patterns
        Number naming ability
        Visuospatial working memory
      ab: Early math abilities are claimed to be linked to magnitude representation ability. Some claim that nonsymbolic magnitude abilities scaffold the acquisition of symbolic (Arabic number) magnitude abilities and influence math ability. Others claim that symbolic magnitude abilities, and ipso facto math abilities, are independent of nonsymbolic abilities and instead depend on the ability to process number symbols (e.g., 2, 7). Currently, the issue of whether symbolic abilities are or are not related to nonsymbolic abilities, and the cognitive factors associated with nonsymbolic–symbolic relationships, remains unresolved. We suggest that different nonsymbolic–symbolic relationships reside within the general magnitude ability distribution and that different cognitive abilities are likely associated with these different relationships. We further suggest that the different nonsymbolic–symbolic relationships and cognitive abilities in combination differentially predict math abilities. To test these claims, we used latent profile analysis to identify nonsymbolic–symbolic judgment patterns of 124, 5- to 7-year-olds. We also assessed four cognitive factors (visuospatial working memory [VSWM], naming numbers, nonverbal IQ, and basic reaction time [RT]) and two math abilities (number transcoding and single-digit addition abilities). Four nonsymbolic–symbolic ability profiles were identified. Naming numbers, VSWM, and basic RT abilities were differentially associated with the different ability profiles and in combination differentially predicted math abilities. Findings show that different patterns of nonsymbolic–symbolic magnitude abilities can be identified and suggest that an adequate account of math development should specify the inter-relationship between cognitive factors and nonsymbolic–symbolic ability patterns.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N