Unconscious Evidence.

Can beliefs that are not consciously formulated serve as part of an agent's evidence for other beliefs? A common view says no, any belief that is psychologically immediate is also epistemically immediate. I argue that some unconscious beliefs can serve as evidence, but other unconscious beliefs cann...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Issues Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 243 - 263
Autor principal: Lyons, Jack
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=118989491&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 118989491
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15336077
        1731
      jtl: Philosophical Issues
      issn: 15336077
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2016
      vid: 26
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        118989491
        10.1111/phis.12073
      ppf: 243
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 126KB
      tig:
        atl: Unconscious Evidence.
      aug:
        au: Lyons, Jack
        affil: University of Arkansas
      su:
        Belief & doubt
        Subconsciousness
        Problem solving
        Epistemic logic
        Distinction (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Belief & doubt
          Subconsciousness
          Problem solving
          Epistemic logic
          Distinction (Philosophy)
      ab: Can beliefs that are not consciously formulated serve as part of an agent's evidence for other beliefs? A common view says no, any belief that is psychologically immediate is also epistemically immediate. I argue that some unconscious beliefs can serve as evidence, but other unconscious beliefs cannot. Person-level beliefs can serve as evidence, but subpersonal beliefs cannot. I try to clarify the nature of the personal/subpersonal distinction and to show how my proposal illuminates various epistemological problems and provides a principled framework for solving other problems.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophical Issues is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophical Issues
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2016
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N