SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INDIAN AND STOIC LOGIC.
In this paper, I try to show that Indian and Stoic logic are more similar to each other than to standard logic. To do that, I analyze a passage of the Kathāvatthu that has been interpreted as proposing the definition of the conditional assumed by modern propositional logic, and argue that that inter...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 90; pp. 137 - 144 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2016
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=119466627&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 119466627 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2016 vid: 90 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 119466627 10.15388/Problemos.2016.90.10141 ppf: 137 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.4MB tig: atl: SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INDIAN AND STOIC LOGIC. aug: au: López-Astorga, Miguel affil: Instituto de Estudios Humanísticos "Juan Ignacio Molina", Universidad de Talca. Av. Lircay s/n, Talca, Chile su: Stoicism Ancient logic Cognitive learning theory Conditionals (Logic) Buddhist literature sug: subj: Stoicism Ancient logic Cognitive learning theory Conditionals (Logic) Buddhist literature keyword: Chrysippus of Soli conditional Kathāvatthu standard logic Stoic logic Chrisipas Solietis sąlyginis teiginys stoikų logika teiginių logika ab: In this paper, I try to show that Indian and Stoic logic are more similar to each other than to standard logic. To do that, I analyze a passage of the Kathāvatthu that has been interpreted as proposing the definition of the conditional assumed by modern propositional logic, and argue that that interpretation is not absolutely justified. In this way, I contend that what is said in that passage and the actual view of the conditional presented in the Kathāvatthu are also consistent with the criterion of the conditional held by Chrysippus of Soli. Šiuo straipsniu mėginama parodyti, jog Indijos ir stoikų logika yra panašesnės viena į kitą nei į standartinę logiką. Šiuo tikslu analizuojama ištrauka iš Kathāvatthu, kurioje pateikiamas sąlyginio teiginio apibrėžimas dažnai interpretuojamas kaip atitinkantis modernioje teiginių logikoje vartojamą materialiosios implikacijos sampratą. Teigiama, jog tokia interpretacija nėra visiškai pagrįsta. Todėl daroma išvada, jog tai, kas iš tiesų sakoma aptariamoje ištraukoje, nuosekliai susiję su Chrisipo Soliečio pasiūlytu sąlyginio teiginio teisingumo kriterijumi. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2016 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|