Capillary blood for point-of-care testing.

Clinically, blood sample analysis has been widely used for health monitoring. In hospitals, arterial and venous blood are utilized to detect various disease biomarkers. However, collection methods are invasive, painful, may result in injury and contamination, and skilled workers are required, making...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences Vol. 54; no. 5; pp. 294 - 309
Main Authors: Tang, Ruihua, Yang, Hui, Choi, Jane Ru, Gong, Yan, You, MinLi, Wen, Ting, Li, Ang, Li, XiuJun, Xu, Bo, Zhang, Sufeng, Mei, Qibing, Xu, Feng
Format: pictorial review tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Aug2017
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:Clinically, blood sample analysis has been widely used for health monitoring. In hospitals, arterial and venous blood are utilized to detect various disease biomarkers. However, collection methods are invasive, painful, may result in injury and contamination, and skilled workers are required, making these methods unsuitable for use in a resource-limited setting. In contrast, capillary blood is easily collected by a minimally invasive procedure and has excellent potential for use in point-of-care (POC) health monitoring. In this review, we first discuss the differences among arterial blood, venous blood, and capillary blood in terms of the puncture sites, components, sample volume, collection methods, and application areas. Additionally, we review the most recent advances in capillary blood-based commercial products and microfluidic instruments for various applications. We also compare the accuracy of microfluidic-based testing with that of laboratory-based testing for capillary blood-based disease diagnosis at the POC. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future perspectives for developing capillary blood-based POC instruments.