Counter-cyclical Voting in the United Kingdom.

By extending the time-tested reward–punishment hypothesis in economic voting, this article argues that rational voters hold incumbents accountable for the macroeconomic policies they pursue rather than purely for the economic climate that prevails under their tenure. Building on this premise, I firs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Political Studies Vol. 65; no. 4; pp. 1040 - 1059
Autor principal: Bojar, Abel
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Dec2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=126378115&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 126378115
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00323217
        PSZ
      jtl: Political Studies
      issn: 00323217
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2017
      vid: 65
      iid: 4
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        126378115
        10.1177/0032321717702399
      ppf: 1040
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
              db: hlh
              ui: 126378115
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              db: hlh
              ui: 126378115
      tig:
        atl: Counter-cyclical Voting in the United Kingdom.
      aug:
        au: Bojar, Abel
        affil: European Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
      su:
        United Kingdom
        Voting
        Unemployment
        Elections
        Labor market
        History
        Economic voting
        Voter attitudes
        Macroeconomics -- Government policy
        British history
        British politics & government
      sug:
        subj:
          Voting
          Unemployment
          Elections
          Labor market
          History
          United Kingdom
          Economic voting
          Voter attitudes
          Macroeconomics -- Government policy
          British history
          British politics & government
      keyword:
        economic voting
        elections
        fiscal policy
        median voter
        vote intention
        economic voting
        elections
        fiscal policy
        median voter
        vote intention
      ab: By extending the time-tested reward–punishment hypothesis in economic voting, this article argues that rational voters hold incumbents accountable for the macroeconomic policies they pursue rather than purely for the economic climate that prevails under their tenure. Building on this premise, I first put forward a theory where business cycle fluctuations realign relative fiscal preferences among income groups. This theory’s implications predict that the aggregate electoral response to fiscal decisions evolves in a counter-cyclical fashion. Using quarterly measures of vote intention shares of incumbent parties in the United Kingdom, I provide time-series evidence from a set of error correction models supporting this proposition: at times of low unemployment, the electorate punishes profligate incumbents; in deteriorating labour market conditions, however, they reward expansionary policies. The immediate electoral impact is non-significant across the models, and most of the estimated effect is spread out across subsequent quarters.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N