The non-remedial value of dependence on moral testimony.
In this paper I defend dependence on moral testimony. I show how going defenses of dependence on moral testimony have portrayed it as second-best by centering on how and why it is an important means to overcoming our defects. I argue that once we consider the pervasiveness of moral testimony in the...
| Publicado en: | Philosophical Studies Vol. 175; no. 3; pp. 629 - 648 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Mar2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=127969480&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 127969480 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318116 4L8 jtl: Philosophical Studies issn: 00318116 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2018 vid: 175 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 127969480 10.1007/s11098-017-0885-6 ppf: 629 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 389KB tig: atl: The non-remedial value of dependence on moral testimony. aug: au: McShane, Paddy Jane affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Portland, 5000 N. Willamette Blvd., 97203, Portland, OR, USA su: Testimony (Theory of knowledge) Moral agent (Philosophy) Moral realism Ethics Optimism sug: subj: Testimony (Theory of knowledge) Moral agent (Philosophy) Moral realism Ethics Optimism keyword: Dependence Moral deference Moral testimony Trust ab: In this paper I defend dependence on moral testimony. I show how going defenses of dependence on moral testimony have portrayed it as second-best by centering on how and why it is an important means to overcoming our defects. I argue that once we consider the pervasiveness of moral testimony in the context of intimate relationships, we can see that the value of dependence on moral testimony goes beyond this: it is not only our flaws and limitations that justify our dependence on moral testimony, but also the importance of such dependence for the flourishing of our intimate relationships. On my view, dependence on moral testimony is not simply for those who cannot realize the ideals of moral agency; it is among those ideals. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2018. All Rights Reserved. item: Philosophical Studies holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|