SELECTED FACTORS IN READING COMPREHENSION FOR DEAF AND HEARING ADULTS: PHONOLOGICAL SKILLS AND METACOGNITION.
The purpose of the study was to identify factors related to reading comprehension, and to compare similarities and differences in the reading processes of deaf and hearing adults. The sample included four groups, each consisting of 15 adults. The groups were identified as (a) deaf high-achieving rea...
| Publicado en: | American Annals of the Deaf Vol. 162; no. 5; pp. 445 - 463 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
American Annals of the Deaf
Winter2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=128289262&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 128289262 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 0002726X AOD jtl: American Annals of the Deaf issn: 0002726X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Winter2018 vid: 162 iid: 5 pid: 2466 pub: American Annals of the Deaf place: Washington, District of Columbia artinfo: ui: 128289262 128289262 128289262 10.1353/aad.2018.0003 128289262 ppf: 445 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: SELECTED FACTORS IN READING COMPREHENSION FOR DEAF AND HEARING ADULTS: PHONOLOGICAL SKILLS AND METACOGNITION. aug: au: Wang, Ye Silvestri, Julia A. Jahromi, Laudan B. sug: subj: Reading Evaluation Deafness Competency Assessment Human Male Female Phonology Cognition Adult Middle Age Checklists Sign Language Descriptive Statistics Data Analysis Software Pearson's Correlation Coefficient Two-Way Analysis of Variance Videorecording Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male Female ab: The purpose of the study was to identify factors related to reading comprehension, and to compare similarities and differences in the reading processes of deaf and hearing adults. The sample included four groups, each consisting of 15 adults. The groups were identified as (a) deaf high-achieving readers, (b) deaf low- achieving readers, (c) hearing high-achieving readers, and (d) hearing low- achieving readers. Measurement instruments included a demographic form along with assessments of reading comprehension, phonological skills, and metacognition, the latter of which contained both a making- inferences measure and a think-aloud discussion with a reading strategies checklist. Results indicated that deaf high- achieving readers performed similarly to hearing high-achieving readers, except for phonological skills, and that for all participants, phonological skills and metacognition were related to reading comprehension skills. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|