GLIMMERINGS OF THE POSTMODERN IN THOMAS HARDY'S JUDE THE OBSCURE.

In their evaluation ofJude the Obscure (1895), some earlier literary critics have justifiably (given the historical context) judged the text by the standards of the then dominant and sustained New Criticism trend, taking into account its symbiotic relationship with modernist aesthetics. The basic pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Victorian Literature & Culture Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 201 - 220
Autor principal: Elbarbary, Samir
Formato: Literary Criticism
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Mar2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=128688927&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 128688927
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10601503
        2VB
      jtl: Victorian Literature & Culture
      issn: 10601503
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2018
      vid: 46
      iid: 1
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        128688927
        10.1017/S1060150317000390
      ppf: 201
      ppct: 19
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: GLIMMERINGS OF THE POSTMODERN IN THOMAS HARDY'S JUDE THE OBSCURE.
      aug:
        au: Elbarbary, Samir
        affil: Dammam University (Emeritus)
      su:
        Jude the Obscure (Book : Hardy)
        Hardy, Thomas, 1840-1928
        New Criticism
        Modernism (Literature)
        Contradiction in literature
        Victorian (Literary period)
      sug:
        subj:
          Jude the Obscure (Book : Hardy)
          Hardy, Thomas, 1840-1928
          New Criticism
          Modernism (Literature)
          Contradiction in literature
          Victorian (Literary period)
      ab: In their evaluation ofJude the Obscure (1895), some earlier literary critics have justifiably (given the historical context) judged the text by the standards of the then dominant and sustained New Criticism trend, taking into account its symbiotic relationship with modernist aesthetics. The basic premise behind this conception was the aesthetic notion of structural and thematic unity as well as coherence and integrity of character. These notions were high on the agenda of the New Criticism of the 1940s and onwards. The narrative was found most lacking in this respect. An article entitled, “Hardy and the Fragmentation of Consciousness” (1975) by Harold L. Weatherby, a foremost Hardy critic, serves as an outstanding example of such a critical view. It makes the case that what ails Jude is its unruliness and disjunctiveness: “the brilliance of the novel's peripheries can scarcely compensate for a profound weakness at its center. Indeed the centre cannot hold: the book falls into fragments” (“Hardy” 469). Weatherby continues, arguing that “There is no unified authorial consciousness” (470), that “Hardy as narrator contradicts himself repeatedly in his estimation of what is right or wrong, good or bad, for his characters” (470), and that it is “an artistic failure . . . failing to achieve unity and coherence” (479). Hardy, in addition, is undeservedly dismissed as “the old-fashioned man from Wessex” (483) – which reminds us of the well-known “good little Thomas Hardy” epithets of Henry James's adverse judgment (Cox xxxi). The article also associates incoherence and contradictions in the narrative with attitudinal ambivalences in Hardy's own mind (473, 476). Undeniably, Jude is permeated with incoherence. Who can disagree? It is deeply involved in sustained and unsettled opposition and what may be termed the play of Derridean différance (Positions 14). And, indeed, Hardy himself acknowledges the tangle of disconnections and self-contradictions disrupting the stability of character in a notebook admission (which shows it to be his design): Of course the book is all contrasts . . . Sue and her heathen gods set against Jude's reading the Greek testament; Christminster academical, Christminster in the slums; Jude the saint, Jude the sinner; Sue the Pagan, Sue the saint, marriage, no marriage; &c., &c. (Life 272–73)
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Literary Criticism
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N