THE FREGE-GEACH PROBLEM, MODUS PONENS, AND LEGAL LANGUAGE.
This paper proposes a new pragmatic interpretation of the Frege-Geach problem and presents a possible solution using a model of ascriptive legal language. The first section includes the definition of the Frege-Geach problem. In the second section, I analyze the content of Geach's critical argument a...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 93; pp. 167 - 177 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=129358684&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 129358684 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2018 vid: 93 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 129358684 10.15388/Problemos.2018.93.11760 ppf: 167 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.9MB tig: atl: THE FREGE-GEACH PROBLEM, MODUS PONENS, AND LEGAL LANGUAGE. aug: au: Ogleznev, Vitaly affil: Department of Logic and History of PhilosophyTomsk State University 36 Lenin Avenue, Tomsk 634050, Russia su: Pragmatism Legal language Geach, Peter Thomas, 1916-2013 Performative (Philosophy) Frege, Gottlob, 1848-1925 sug: subj: Pragmatism Legal language Geach, Peter Thomas, 1916-2013 Performative (Philosophy) Frege, Gottlob, 1848-1925 keyword: ascriptive language ascriptivism Frege-Geach Problem Modus Ponens askriptyvi kalba askriptyvizmas Frege's-Geacho problema ab: This paper proposes a new pragmatic interpretation of the Frege-Geach problem and presents a possible solution using a model of ascriptive legal language. The first section includes the definition of the Frege-Geach problem. In the second section, I analyze the content of Geach's critical argument against prescriptivism in ethics. I discuss what Geach means by ascriptivism, why he mixes it with prescriptivism, and why a particular article by Herbert Hart became the subject of criticism by Geach. The third section proposes a possible solution to the Frege-Geach problem based on the explication of the assertoric force of ascriptive legal utterances and the performativity of legal language. Straipsnyje pristatau naują - pragmatinę Frege's-Geacho problemos interpretaciją ir siūlau galimą problemos sprendimą naudojantis askriptyvios teisės kalbos modeliu. Pirmame skirsnyje apibrėžiu Frege's-Geacho problemą. Antrame skirsnyje analizuoju Geacho kritinius argumentus, nukreiptus prieš preskriptyvizmą etikoje. Nagrinėju, kokį turinį Geachas priskiria askriptyvizmui, kodėl jis painioja askriptyvizmą su preskriptyvizmu ir dėl ko Geachas kritikuoja Herberto Harto straipsnį (1951). Trečiame skirsnyje siūlau galimą Frege's-Geacho problemos sprendimą, paremtą asertorine galia, būdinga askriptyvioms teisės kalbos išraiškoms, ir teisės kalbos performatyvumu. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|