The Concrete--Representational--Abstract Approach for Students With Learning Disabilities: An Evidence-Based Practice Synthesis.

As researchers and practitioners have increasingly become interested in what practices are evidence based and for whom in education, different sets of quality indicators and evidence-based practice standards have emerged in the field of special education. Practices are commonly suggested as evidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Remedial & Special Education Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 211 - 229
Autores principales: Bouck, Emily C., Satsangi, Rajiv, Park, Jiyoon, Maggin, Daniel
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts meta synthesis Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Jul/Aug2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:As researchers and practitioners have increasingly become interested in what practices are evidence based and for whom in education, different sets of quality indicators and evidence-based practice standards have emerged in the field of special education. Practices are commonly suggested as evidence based, even without a best evidence synthesis on the existing research, such as the case with the concrete-representational-abstract (CRA) instructional framework to support students with disabilities in mathematics. This study sought to support the classification of the CRA instructional framework as an evidence-based approach for students with learning disabilities by applying quality indicators and standards of evidence-based practice by Cook et al. (2014). Based on the application of the indicators and standards, the CRA instructional framework was determined to be an evidence-based practice for students with learning disabilities who struggle in mathematics relative to computational problems, such as addition, subtraction, and multiplication, largely with regrouping.