Enoch’s “Taking-Morality-Seriously Thought” Unpacked and at Work in the Argument from Impartiality.
After a brief outline of Enoch’s defense of robust realism in his Taking Morality Seriously (§ 1), I focus on Enoch’s taking-morality-seriously thought by making explicit the assumptions I see involved in it (§ 2). Enoch’s argument from impartiality is then reconstructed (§ 3) to show how these assu...
| Publicado en: | Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 591 - 603 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=132814761&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 132814761 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01677411 NM2 jtl: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy issn: 01677411 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2018 vid: 37 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 132814761 10.1007/s11245-016-9449-1 ppf: 591 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 702KB tig: atl: Enoch’s “Taking-Morality-Seriously Thought” Unpacked and at Work in the Argument from Impartiality. aug: au: Mancuso, Giuliana affil: Dipartimento di Filosofia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (Milan), Largo Gemelli 1, 20123, Milan, Italy su: Ethics Fairness Phenomenology Realism Objectivism (Philosophy) sug: subj: Ethics Fairness Phenomenology Realism Objectivism (Philosophy) keyword: Disagreement Impartiality Moral objectivism Moral phenomenology Non-naturalism Robust realism ab: After a brief outline of Enoch’s defense of robust realism in his Taking Morality Seriously (§ 1), I focus on Enoch’s taking-morality-seriously thought by making explicit the assumptions I see involved in it (§ 2). Enoch’s argument from impartiality is then reconstructed (§ 3) to show how these assumptions are at work (§ 4). Next (§§ 5 and 6), I explain the reasons why Enoch does not succeed in converting these assumptions into a positive argument for the thesis implied by robust realism that there is a moral objectivity. Finally (§ 7), I conclude that the critical analysis provided casts a shadow on the reliability of the taking-morality-seriously thought as a basis of a theoretical inquiry into the nature of morality. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy is a copyright of Springer, 2018. All Rights Reserved. item: Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|