Computer‐assisted vocabulary instruction for students with disabilities: Evidence from an effect size analysis of single‐subject experimental design studies.

The purpose of this study was to synthesize the effectiveness of computer‐assisted instruction (CAI) studies aiming to increase vocabulary for students with disabilities in an effort to identify what type of CAI is promising for practice. An extensive search process with inclusion and exclusion crit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 34; no. 6; pp. 641 - 652
Autores principales: Mize, Min Kyung, Park, Yujeong, Moore, Tara
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=132914532&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 132914532
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2018
      vid: 34
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        132914532
        132914532
        132914532
        10.1111/jcal.12272
        132914532
      ppf: 641
      ppct: 11
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Computer‐assisted vocabulary instruction for students with disabilities: Evidence from an effect size analysis of single‐subject experimental design studies.
      aug:
        au:
          Mize, Min Kyung
          Park, Yujeong
          Moore, Tara
        affil: Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, Winthrop University, Rock Hill SC, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Computer-Assisted Instruction
          Vocabulary Education
          Students with Disabilities
          Human
          Psycinfo
          Database Vendors
          Systematic Review
          ERIC Database
          Experimental Studies
          Feedback
      ab: The purpose of this study was to synthesize the effectiveness of computer‐assisted instruction (CAI) studies aiming to increase vocabulary for students with disabilities in an effort to identify what type of CAI is promising for practice. An extensive search process with inclusion and exclusion criteria yielded a total of 13 single‐subject design studies to be included in the present study. Effect sizes were calculated using a percentage of nonoverlapping data (PND). We also analysed instructional features (e.g., visual supports, auditory supports, font/color selection, and corrective and interactive feedback) from the studies that examined effective instructional design features of CAI. Results indicated (a) the highest PND mean was for secondary school‐aged learners with disabilities; (b) both tablet‐assisted instructions and nontablet‐assisted instruction produced high PND (i.e., highly effective); and (c) although the majority of selected studies included visual and auditory supports in CAI for vocabulary, none of the studies provided opportunities for customization (e.g., student selection of colors and fonts). On the basis of the findings, implications for future research and practice are discussed. Lay Description: What is already known about this topic: Technology as instructional aids provides students with disabilities with access to general education curriculum.Students with disabilities can benefit from explicit instruction combined with computer‐assisted instruction or intervention.Technology provides avenues for teachers to create learning opportunities and practices. What this paper adds: The use of visual images, animations, and graphics led to positive academic outcomes of students with disabilities.The use of auditory supports was positively associated with the effectiveness of treatments.Providing students with disabilities with a choice can improve their academic outcomes and motivation.Customization makes computer‐assisted instruction or intervention adaptable for different levels of students with disabilities. Implications for practice and/or policy: Technology and evidence‐based practice might reduce the gap in achievement levels between students with and without disabilities.Teachers should embed with explicit instruction that provides necessary support and structure for students with disabilities.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N