Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
Division of attention (DA) at the time of learning has large detrimental effects on subsequent memory performance, but DA at retrieval has much smaller effects (Baddeley, Lewis, Eldridge, & Thomson, 1984, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 518-540; Craik, Govoni, Naveh-Benjamin, & And...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 46; no. 8; pp. 1263 - 1278 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Nov2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=133453120&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 133453120 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2018 vid: 46 iid: 8 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 133453120 10.3758/s13421-018-0835-3 ppf: 1263 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 918KB tig: atl: Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data. aug: au: Craik, Fergus I. M. Eftekhari, Eldar Binns, Malcolm A. affil: Rotman Research Institute at Baycrest, 3560 Bathurst St, M6A 2E1, Toronto, ON, Canada su: Attention Decision making Judgment (Psychology) Memory Recognition (Psychology) Semantics Task performance Human multitasking Reaction time Time sug: subj: Attention Decision making Judgment (Psychology) Memory Recognition (Psychology) Semantics Task performance Human multitasking Reaction time Time keyword: Divided attention Encoding Response latency Response rate Retrieval Divided attention Encoding Response latency Response rate Retrieval ab: Division of attention (DA) at the time of learning has large detrimental effects on subsequent memory performance, but DA at retrieval has much smaller effects (Baddeley, Lewis, Eldridge, & Thomson, 1984, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 518-540; Craik, Govoni, Naveh-Benjamin, & Anderson, 1996, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180). Experiment 1 confirmed the relatively small effects of DA on retrieval and also showed that retrieval operations do consume processing resources. The experiment also found that the effect is not attributable to a trade-off in performance with the concurrent task or to recognition decisions made on the basis of familiarity judgments. Participants made levels-of-processing (LOP) judgments during encoding to check whether deeper semantic judgments were differentially vulnerable to the effects of DA. In fact DA did not interact with LOP. Experiment 2 explored reports that the comparatively slight effect of DA on recognition accuracy is accompanied by a compensatory increase in recognition latency (Baddeley et al., 1984). The experiment replicated findings that neither DA nor differential emphasis between recognition and a concurrent continuous reaction time (CRT) task affected recognition accuracy, but also found evidence for a lawful trade-off in decision latencies between recognition and CRT performance. Further analysis showed that the relationship between response rates on the two tasks was well described by a linear function, and that this function was demonstrated by the majority of individual participants. It is concluded that the small effect of DA on recognition performance is attributable to a trade-off within the recognition task itself; accuracy is maintained by a compensatory increase in decision latency. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|