Evaluation of liver parenchyma stiffness in patients with liver tumours: optimal strategy for shear wave elastography.

Objectives: To determine the methodology of non-invasive test for evaluation of liver stiffness (LS) with tumours using two-dimensional (2D) shear wave elastography (SWE).Methods: One hundred and twenty-seven patients with liver tumours underwent 2D-SWE before surgery to measure liver and spleen sti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 1479 - 1489
Autores principales: Zheng, Wei, Zhou, Zhong-guo, Wong, Chong-hei, Pei, Xiao-qing, Zhuang, Shu-lian, Li, Qing, Chen, Min-Shan, Li, An-hua, Zhang, Fu-jun
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: To determine the methodology of non-invasive test for evaluation of liver stiffness (LS) with tumours using two-dimensional (2D) shear wave elastography (SWE).Methods: One hundred and twenty-seven patients with liver tumours underwent 2D-SWE before surgery to measure liver and spleen stiffness (SS). Two-dimensional SWE values were obtained in the liver at 0-1 cm, 1-2 cm and >2 cm from the tumour edge (PLS-1, PLS-2 and RLS, respectively). The influence of tumour-associated factors was evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each value was analysed to diagnose cirrhosis.Results: PLS-1 was higher than PLS-2, which was even higher than RLS (p < 0.001). The AUCs of PLS-1, PLS-2, RLS and SS for diagnosing cirrhosis were 0.760, 0.833, 0.940 and 0.676, with the specificity of 75.7%, 67.6%, 90.3% and 77.4%, respectively. Tumour sizes, locations or types showed no apparent influence on 2D-SWE values except for RLS, which was higher in patients with primary hepatic carcinomas (p < 0.05).Conclusions: LS with tumours is best measured at >2 cm away from the tumour edge. SS measurement could be used as an alternative to LS measurement in the event of no available liver for detection.Key Points: • Tumour-associated factors impact background liver stiffness assessment. • Background liver stiffness is best measured at >2 cm from tumour edge. • Spleen stiffness can be an alternative to assess background liver stiffness.