Magnetic resonance elastography SE-EPI vs GRE sequences at 3T in a pediatric population with liver disease.

Purpose: The goal of our study is to compare hepatic stiffness measures using gradient-recalled echo (GRE) versus spin-echo echo planar imaging (SE-EPI)-based MR Elastography (MRE) at 3T used to measure hepatic stiffness in a patients with suspected liver diseases.Materials and methods: This retrosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Abdominal Radiology Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 894 - 903
Autores principales: Calle-Toro, Juan S., Serai, Suraj D., Hartung, Erum A., Goldberg, David J., Bolster, Bradley D., Darge, Kassa, Anupindi, Sudha A.
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: The goal of our study is to compare hepatic stiffness measures using gradient-recalled echo (GRE) versus spin-echo echo planar imaging (SE-EPI)-based MR Elastography (MRE) at 3T used to measure hepatic stiffness in a patients with suspected liver diseases.Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 52 patients with liver disease who underwent a 3T MRE exam including both an investigational SE-EPI-based technique and a product GRE-based technique. Regions of interest (ROI) were placed on the elastograms to measure elastography-derived liver stiffness as well as the area included within the ROIs. The mean liver stiffness values and area of ROIs were compared.Results: The mean liver stiffness was 3.72 kilopascal (kPa) ± 1.29 using GRE MRE and 3.78 kPa ± 1.13 using SE-EPI MRE. Measurement of liver stiffness showed excellent agreement between the two pulse sequences with a mean bias of − 0.1 kPa (range − 1.8 to 1.7 kPa) between sequences. The mean measurable ROI area was higher with SE-EPI (313.8 cm2 ± 213.8) than with the GRE technique (208.6 cm2 ± 114.8), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusions: Our data shows excellent agreement of measured liver stiffness between GRE and SE-EPI-based sequences at 3T. Our results show the advantage of a SE-EPI MRE sequence in terms of image quality, ROI size and acquisition time with equivalent liver stiffness measurements as compared to GRE-MRE sequence.