Diagnostic accuracy of hepatic proton density fat fraction measured by magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of liver steatosis with histology as reference standard: a meta-analysis.

Objectives: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) for the assessment of liver steatosis (LS) with histology as reference standard.Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to iden...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 29; no. 10; pp. 5180 - 5190
Autores principales: Qu, Yali, Li, Mou, Hamilton, Gavin, Zhang, Yingzhen N., Song, Bin
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of hepatic magnetic resonance imaging-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) for the assessment of liver steatosis (LS) with histology as reference standard.Methods: A systematic literature search was performed to identify pertinent studies. Quality analyses were conducted by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. Diagnostic data were extracted and inconsistency index was calculated for LS≥G1, LS≥G2, and LS=G3, respectively. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) served as the indicator of diagnostic accuracy. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated if threshold effect was absent.Results: Thirteen studies containing 1100 subjects were included. There was significant threshold effect for LS≥G1. The AUCs for LS≥G1, LS≥G2, and LS=G3 were 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76, 1.00), 0.91 (95% CI 0.89, 0.94), and 0.92 (95% CI 0.89, 0.94), respectively. The pooled sensitivities for LS≥G2 and LS=G3 were 0.83 (95% CI 0.75, 0.88) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.63, 0.90), respectively; the pooled specificities for LS≥G2 and LS=G3 were 0.89 (95% CI 0.84, 0.92) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.84, 0.92), respectively.Conclusions: MRI-PDFF has high diagnostic accuracy at detecting and grading LS with histology as reference standard, suggesting that MRI-PDFF is able to provide an accurate quantification of LS in clinical trials and patient care.Key Point: • MRI-PDFF is able to provide an accurate quantification of LS in clinical trials and patient care.