Response to Akagi, Hughes, and Springle.
The article presents response on the book "Philosophy within Its Proper Bounds". Topics include considered that they defended the anti-exceptionalism about the method of cases; and show differences between participants experimental philosophy study and philosophers engage with philosophical cases do...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Philosophical Studies Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 608 - 624 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Oct2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | The article presents response on the book "Philosophy within Its Proper Bounds". Topics include considered that they defended the anti-exceptionalism about the method of cases; and show differences between participants experimental philosophy study and philosophers engage with philosophical cases do not justify any skepticism about the meta philosophical relevance of experimental-philosophy studies. |
|---|