Response to Akagi, Hughes, and Springle.

The article presents response on the book "Philosophy within Its Proper Bounds". Topics include considered that they defended the anti-exceptionalism about the method of cases; and show differences between participants experimental philosophy study and philosophers engage with philosophical cases do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Philosophical Studies Vol. 27; no. 4; pp. 608 - 624
Autor principal: Machery, Edouard
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Oct2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=138647870&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 138647870
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09672559
        5BE
      jtl: International Journal of Philosophical Studies
      issn: 09672559
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2019
      vid: 27
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        138647870
        10.1080/09672559.2019.1655950
      ppf: 608
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.3MB
      tig:
        atl: Response to Akagi, Hughes, and Springle.
      aug:
        au: Machery, Edouard
        affil: Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
      su:
        Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds (Book)
        Modern philosophy
        Skepticism
        Philosophers
        Exceptionalism (Political science)
      sug:
        subj:
          Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds (Book)
          Modern philosophy
          Skepticism
          Philosophers
          Exceptionalism (Political science)
      ab: The article presents response on the book "Philosophy within Its Proper Bounds". Topics include considered that they defended the anti-exceptionalism about the method of cases; and show differences between participants experimental philosophy study and philosophers engage with philosophical cases do not justify any skepticism about the meta philosophical relevance of experimental-philosophy studies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of International Journal of Philosophical Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: International Journal of Philosophical Studies
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N