Analysis of Amount and Style of Oral Interaction Related to Language Outcomes in Children With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review (2006-2016).

Purpose: This systematic review summarizes the evidence for differences in the amount of language input between children with and without hearing loss (HL). Of interest to this review is evaluating the associations between language input and language outcomes (receptive and expressive) in children w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research Vol. 62; no. 9; pp. 3470 - 3493
Autores principales: Sultan, Nuzhat, Wong, Lena L. N., Purdy, Suzanne C.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Sep2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=138842102&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 138842102
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10924388
        1SM
      jtl: Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research
      issn: 10924388
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2019
      vid: 62
      iid: 9
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        138842102
        10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-19-0076
      ppf: 3470
      ppct: 23
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Analysis of Amount and Style of Oral Interaction Related to Language Outcomes in Children With Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review (2006-2016).
      aug:
        au:
          Sultan, Nuzhat
          Wong, Lena L. N.
          Purdy, Suzanne C.
        affil:
          Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong, China
          School of Psychology, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
      su:
        Deaf children
        Language acquisition
        Interpersonal communication
        Communication
        Facilitated communication
        Vocabulary
        Word deafness
        Speech therapy
        Hearing disorders in children
        MEDLINE
        Online information services
        Health outcome assessment
        Speech evaluation
        Systematic reviews
      sug:
        subj:
          Deaf children
          Language acquisition
          Interpersonal communication
          Communication
          Facilitated communication
          Vocabulary
          Word deafness
          Speech therapy
          Hearing disorders in children
          MEDLINE
          Online information services
          Health outcome assessment
          Speech evaluation
          Systematic reviews
      ab: Purpose: This systematic review summarizes the evidence for differences in the amount of language input between children with and without hearing loss (HL). Of interest to this review is evaluating the associations between language input and language outcomes (receptive and expressive) in children with HL in order to enhance insight regarding what oral language input is associated with good communication outcomes. Method: A systematic review was conducted using keywords in 3 electronic databases: Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Keywords were related to language input, language outcomes, and HL. Titles and abstracts were screened independently, and full-text manuscripts meeting inclusion criteria were extracted. An appraisal checklist was used to evaluate the methodological quality of studies as poor, good, or excellent. Results: After removing duplicates, 1,545 study results were extracted, with 27 eligible for full-text review. After the appraisal, 8 studies were included in this systematic review. Differences in the amount of language input between children with and without HL were noted. Conversational exchanges, open-ended questions, expansions, recast, and parallel talk were positively associated with stronger receptive and expressive language scores. The quality of evidence was not assessed as excellent for any of the included studies. Conclusions: This systematic review reveals low-level evidence from 8 studies that specific language inputs (amount and style) are optimal for oral language outcomes in children with HL. Limitations were identified as sample selection bias, lack of information on control of confounders and assessment protocols, and limited duration of observation/recordings. Future research should address these limitations.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N