Duhem's problem revisited: logical versus epistemic formulations and solutions.
When the results of an experiment appears to disconfirm a hypothesis, how does one know whether it's the hypothesis, or rather some auxiliary hypothesis or assumption, that is at fault? Philosophers' answers to this question, now known as "Duhem's problem," have differed widely. Despite these differ...
| Published in: | Synthese Vol. 197; no. 1; pp. 337 - 355 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Jan2020
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |