Two roads to the successor axiom.

Most accounts of our knowledge of the successor axiom claim that this is based on the procedure of adding one. While they usually don't claim to provide an account of how children actually acquire this knowledge, one may well think that this is how they get that knowledge. I argue that when we look...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 197; no. 3; pp. 1241 - 1262
Autor principal: Buijsman, Stefan
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=142270100&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 142270100
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2020
      vid: 197
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        142270100
        10.1007/s11229-018-1752-5
      ppf: 1241
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 455KB
      tig:
        atl: Two roads to the successor axiom.
      aug:
        au: Buijsman, Stefan
        affil: Filosofiska Institutionen, Stockholm University, Universitetsvägen 10D, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden
      su:
        Number systems
        Executive succession
        Natural numbers
        Axioms
      sug:
        subj:
          Number systems
          Executive succession
          Natural numbers
          Axioms
      keyword:
        Arithmetical cognition
        Epistemology
        Number concepts
        Successor axiom
      ab: Most accounts of our knowledge of the successor axiom claim that this is based on the procedure of adding one. While they usually don't claim to provide an account of how children actually acquire this knowledge, one may well think that this is how they get that knowledge. I argue that when we look at children's responses in interviews, the time when they learn the successor axiom and the intermediate learning stages they find themselves in, that there is an empirically viable alternative. I argue that they could also learn it on the basis of a method that has to do with the structure of the numeral system. Specifically, that they (1) use the syntactic structure of the numeral system and (2) attend to the leftmost digits, the one with the highest place-value. Children can learn that this is a reliable method of forming larger numbers by combining two elements. First, a grasp of the syntactic structure of the numeral system. That way they know that the leftmost digit receives the highest value. Second, an interpretation of numerals as designating cardinal values, so that they also realise that increasing or adding digits on the lefthand side of a numeral produces a larger number. There are thus two, currently equally well-supported, ways in which children might learn that there are infinitely many natural numbers.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N