A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co‐design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health‐care teams.

Introduction: Co‐design involves stakeholders as design partners to ensure a better fit to user needs. Many benefits of involving stakeholders in design processes have been proposed; however, few studies have evaluated participants' experience of co‐design in the development of educational intervent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 358 - 368
Autores principales: Pallesen, Kirsten Siig, Rogers, Lisa, Anjara, Sabrina, De Brún, Aoife, McAuliffe, Eilish
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=142479595&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 142479595
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2020
      vid: 23
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        142479595
        142479595
        145783134
        142479595
        10.1111/hex.13002
        142479595
      ppf: 358
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: A qualitative evaluation of participants' experiences of using co‐design to develop a collective leadership educational intervention for health‐care teams.
      aug:
        au:
          Pallesen, Kirsten Siig
          Rogers, Lisa
          Anjara, Sabrina
          De Brún, Aoife
          McAuliffe, Eilish
        affil: UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education and Innovation in Health Systems, School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland
      sug:
        subj:
          Stakeholder Participation Psychosocial Factors
          Seminars and Workshops
          Leadership
          Program Development
          Multidisciplinary Care Team
          Human
          Funding Source
          Qualitative Studies
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Audiorecording
          Thematic Analysis
          Health Services Research
          Implementation Science
          Quality Improvement
          Health Personnel Psychosocial Factors
          Research Personnel Psychosocial Factors
          Patients Psychosocial Factors
          Telephone
          Feedback
          Male
          Female
          Male
          Female
      ab: Introduction: Co‐design involves stakeholders as design partners to ensure a better fit to user needs. Many benefits of involving stakeholders in design processes have been proposed; however, few studies have evaluated participants' experience of co‐design in the development of educational interventions. As part of a larger study, health‐care professionals, researchers and patients co‐designed a collective leadership intervention for health‐care teams. This study evaluated their experiences of the co‐design process. Methods: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with individuals (n = 10) who took part in the co‐design workshops. Interviews were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Results: Four key themes were identified from the data: (a) Managing expectations in an open‐ended process; (b) Establishing a positive team climate; (c) Focusing on frustrations—challenging but informative; and (d) Achieving a genuine co‐design partnership. Conclusions: The development of a positive team climate is essential to the co‐design process. Organizers should focus on building strong working relationships from the beginning to enable open discussion. Organizers of co‐design should be conscious of establishing and maintaining a genuine partnership where participants are involved as equal partners and co‐creators. This can be done through the continuous use of feedback to allow participants to influence the workshop directions, and through limiting researcher domination. Lastly, co‐design can be daunting, but organizers can positively impact participants' experience by acknowledging the emergent nature of the process in order to reduce participant apprehension, thereby limiting the barriers to participation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N