The development of the listening in spatialised noise – universal test (LiSN-U) and preliminary evaluation in English-speaking listeners.

Objective: To create a language independent version of the Listening in Spatialised Noise – Sentences test (LiSN-S) and evaluate it in an English-speaking population. Design: Test development and normative data collection. LiSN-Universal (LiSN-U) targets consisted of CVCV pseudo-words (e.g. /mupa/)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Audiology Vol. 59; no. 4; pp. 263 - 272
Autores principales: Cameron, Sharon, Mealings, Kiri Trengove, Chong-White, Nicky, Young, Taegan, Dillon, Harvey
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Objective: To create a language independent version of the Listening in Spatialised Noise – Sentences test (LiSN-S) and evaluate it in an English-speaking population. Design: Test development and normative data collection. LiSN-Universal (LiSN-U) targets consisted of CVCV pseudo-words (e.g. /mupa/). Two looped distracter tracks consisted of CVCVCVCV pseudo-words. The listener's task was to repeat back the target pseudo-words. Stimuli were presented over headphones using an iPad. Speech reception thresholds were measured adaptively. In the co-located condition all stimuli came from directly in front. In the spatially-separated condition the distracters emanated from +90° and −90° azimuth. Perceived location was manipulated using head-related transfer functions. Spatial advantage was calculated as the difference in dB between the co-located and spatially separated conditions. Study samples: Stimulus intelligibility data were collected from 20 adults. Normative data were collected from native English speakers (23 adults and 127 children). Results: Children's spatially separated, co-located, and spatial advantage results improved significantly with age. Spatial advantage was 4–6 dB larger in the LiSN-U than LiSN-S depending on age group. Conclusion: Whereas additional research in non-native English populations is required, the LiSN-U appears to be an effective tool for measuring spatial processing ability.