Afterword: turning and twisting histories of women's education: reading reflexively and diffractively.
The Afterword discusses continuities and differences in how researchers are positioned in feminist themes and emerging feminist perspectives as they play out in debates around researcher reflexivity and diffraction as methodological strategies. The first section of the Afterword highlights the ongoi...
| Publicado en: | Women's History Review Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 480 - 495 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
May2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=142906651&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 142906651 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09612025 GP6 jtl: Women's History Review issn: 09612025 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2020 vid: 29 iid: 3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 142906651 10.1080/09612025.2019.1611134 ppf: 480 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.3MB tig: atl: Afterword: turning and twisting histories of women's education: reading reflexively and diffractively. aug: au: Anderson-Faithful, Sue Goodman, Joyce affil: Institute of Education, Faculty of Education, Health and Social Care, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK Faculty of Education, Health and Social Care, University of Winchester, Winchester, UK su: Feminism Reading Archival research Prologues & epilogues Reflexivity sug: subj: Feminism Reading Archival research Prologues & epilogues Reflexivity ab: The Afterword discusses continuities and differences in how researchers are positioned in feminist themes and emerging feminist perspectives as they play out in debates around researcher reflexivity and diffraction as methodological strategies. The first section of the Afterword highlights the ongoing commitment to reflexivity when generating knowledge in women's and gender history. The second part focuses on the challenge to reflexivity posed by diffractive methodologies that argue that knowledge is created from being entangled in the world, rather than reflecting on or during the production of historical work. This section discusses two examples of diffractive practice in archival research taken from the special issue. The third section outlines diffractive reading in more detail and provides two examples of diffractive reading of texts. Finally, the Afterword invites readers to undertake a diffractive reading of the articles in the special issue and provides some questions about diffraction for consideration. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Women's History Review is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Women's History Review holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|