On site comparison of the OSHA 42, Asset EZ4-NCO, Iso-Chek, DAN and CIP10 methods for measuring toluene diisocyanate (TDI) at a polyurethane foam factory.

Because of the semi-volatile nature of diisocyanates (being airborne in both physical vapor and particulate phases), their high reactivity and low occupational exposure limits, diisocyanate exposure evaluation has been challenging for industrial hygienists and laboratories. The objective of this stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene Vol. 17; no. 5; pp. 207 - 220
Autores principales: Aubin, Simon, Hamdi, El Mekki, Joly, Audrey, Sarazin, Philippe, Lesage, Jacques, Breau, Livain, Spence, Mark, Gagné, Sébastien
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd May2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=143140377&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 143140377
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15459624
        V1L
      jtl: Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene
      issn: 15459624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2020
      vid: 17
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        143140377
        143140377
        145611973
        143140377
        10.1080/15459624.2020.1731518
        143140377
      ppf: 207
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: On site comparison of the OSHA 42, Asset EZ4-NCO, Iso-Chek, DAN and CIP10 methods for measuring toluene diisocyanate (TDI) at a polyurethane foam factory.
      aug:
        au:
          Aubin, Simon
          Hamdi, El Mekki
          Joly, Audrey
          Sarazin, Philippe
          Lesage, Jacques
          Breau, Livain
          Spence, Mark
          Gagné, Sébastien
        affil: Laboratory Division, Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail, Montréal, Québec, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Environmental Monitoring Methods
          Particle Size Evaluation
          Toluene Analysis
          Organic Chemicals Analysis
          Polyurethanes
          United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration
          Manufacturing Industry
          Human
          Occupational Health
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          Occupational Exposure Adverse Effects
          Sampling Bias
      ab: Because of the semi-volatile nature of diisocyanates (being airborne in both physical vapor and particulate phases), their high reactivity and low occupational exposure limits, diisocyanate exposure evaluation has been challenging for industrial hygienists and laboratories. The objective of this study was to compare the toluene diisocyanate (2,4 and 2,6 isomers, TDI) concentration measured by five methods in a flexible polyurethane foam factory using different collection or derivatization approaches. The methods used were: OSHA 42 modified (filter, 1-(2-pyridyl)piperazine) (OSHA), Asset EZ4-NCO (denuder and filter, dibutylamine) (Asset), Iso-Chek (double-filter, 9-(N-methylaminomethyl) anthracene and 1,2-methoxyphenylpiperazine), DAN (filter, 1,8-diaminonaphthalene), and CIP10 (centrifugation, 1,2-methoxyphenylpiperazine). Particle real-time monitoring for concentration and size distribution was performed in parallel to improve the understanding of the potential bias between methods. The comparison study was performed over 3 days, providing 18 replicates for each of the 5 methods. Isocyanate concentrations collected for each sampling method were compared using linear mixed effect modeling. Compared to OSHA, which yielded the highest concentrations overall, the Asset and DAN methods provided the smallest biases (−29% (95% CI [−52;−6]) and −45% (95% CI [−67;−23]), respectively), while the CIP10 and Iso-Chek methods provided the largest biases (−82% (95% CI [−105;−66]) and −96% (95% CI [−118;−75]), respectively). The substantial bias of Iso-Chek and CIP10 seemed to be explained by the predominance of TDI in the form of sub-micron particles that were inadequately captured by these two methods due to their sampling principle, which are particle filtration without derivatizing agent and centrifugation respectively. Asset and DAN performance seemed to decrease as the sampling time increased. While DAN's bias could be related to a reagent deficiency on the filter, the disparities between OSHA and Asset, both considered as reference methods, highlight the fact that the mechanisms of collection, derivation and extraction do not seem to be completely controlled. Finally, an upward trend has been observed between concentrations of particles below 300 nm in size and concentration levels of TDI. It has also been observed that TDI levels increased with the TDI foam index produced at the facility.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N