Spatiotemporal functionalism v. the conceivability of zombies*.

It is easy enough to see that this thesis entails Stoljar's no-entailment thesis, at least if we understand phenomenal truths in such a way that if there is no conscious experience (or no conscious being) there are no phenomenal truths. If we have a good argument for dualism about smell experience,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nous (0029-4624) Vol. 54; no. 2; pp. 488 - 498
Autor principal: Chalmers, David J.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=143356893&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 143356893
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00294624
        D97
      jtl: Nous (0029-4624)
      issn: 00294624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2020
      vid: 54
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        143356893
        10.1111/nous.12331
      ppf: 488
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 109KB
      tig:
        atl: Spatiotemporal functionalism v. the conceivability of zombies*.
      aug:
        au: Chalmers, David J.
        affil: New York University
      su:
        Philosophy of mind
        Modern philosophy
        Cartesianism (Philosophy)
        Mind & body
        Monism
        Spacetime
        Holism
      sug:
        subj:
          Philosophy of mind
          Modern philosophy
          Cartesianism (Philosophy)
          Mind & body
          Monism
          Spacetime
          Holism
      ab: It is easy enough to see that this thesis entails Stoljar's no-entailment thesis, at least if we understand phenomenal truths in such a way that if there is no conscious experience (or no conscious being) there are no phenomenal truths. If we have a good argument for dualism about smell experience, dualism about dogs' experience, and dualism about future humans' experience, then we have established mind-body dualism. The view I am most inclined to accept is neither a purely phenomenal spatial functionalism (with only phenomenal roles) or nonphenomenal spatial functionalism, but a combined phenomenal/nonphenomenal spatial functionalism (combined spatial functionalism for short) where reference to space is fixed by both phenomenal and nonphenomenal roles. This response is closely related to Stoljar's objection 5, which says Stoljar's dilemma can be avoided by appealing to a nonphenomenal spatial functionalism.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Nous (0029-4624) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Nous (0029-4624)
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N