A comparison of sampling approaches for monitoring schoolwide inclusion program fidelity.
Including students with disabilities requires schoolwide interventions that are implemented with fidelity (adherence). Collection of fidelity data may become problematic when multiple evidence-based treatments exist in one setting. To address concerns around efficiency of data collection, this study...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Developmental Disabilities Vol. 66; no. 3; pp. 204 - 214 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jun2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=143544667&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 143544667 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 20473869 F2SP jtl: International Journal of Developmental Disabilities issn: 20473869 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2020 vid: 66 iid: 3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 143544667 143544667 143544667 10.1080/20473869.2018.1546793 143544667 ppf: 204 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A comparison of sampling approaches for monitoring schoolwide inclusion program fidelity. aug: au: Bohanon, Hank S. Wu, Meng-Jia affil: School of Education, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA sug: subj: Students with Disabilities Sampling Methods Schools Social Inclusion Human Comparative Studies Random Assignment Program Implementation ab: Including students with disabilities requires schoolwide interventions that are implemented with fidelity (adherence). Collection of fidelity data may become problematic when multiple evidence-based treatments exist in one setting. To address concerns around efficiency of data collection, this study hypothesized that the three sampling approaches (proportional, consensus, stratified random) provided similar levels of agreement with an expert rater, thus warranting the differentiation in their applications based on the needs of the evaluators. Three high schools were randomly assigned to one of three sampling approaches (i.e. proportional, consensus, stratified random) to complete a fidelity measure for the implementation of a schoolwide inclusion approach. Based on the Median Test, each sampling approach did not differ significantly from the scores of an expert rater. The results indicate that schools may have some choice in the methods they use to sample their staff around the measurement of fidelity of implementation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|