Anxiety and Depression Among Socioeconomically Vulnerable Students with Learning Disabilities: Exploratory Meta-analysis.

This study explored the hypothesis that socioeconomically vulnerable children and adolescents who have learning disabilities (LDs) more prevalently experience anxiety and depression than their otherwise similar peers in elementary or high school who are not socioeconomically vulnerable. A systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 359 - 368
Autores principales: Brunelle, Katrina, Abdulle, Safia, Gorey, Kevin M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=144546971&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 144546971
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07380151
        COK
      jtl: Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal
      issn: 07380151
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2020
      vid: 37
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        144546971
        10.1007/s10560-019-00631-w
      ppf: 359
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 653KB
      tig:
        atl: Anxiety and Depression Among Socioeconomically Vulnerable Students with Learning Disabilities: Exploratory Meta-analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Brunelle, Katrina
          Abdulle, Safia
          Gorey, Kevin M.
        affil: School of Social Work, University of Windsor, 167 Ferry Street, N9A 0C5, Windsor, ON, Canada
      su:
        Anxiety
        Mental depression
        Students with disabilities
        High school students
        Learning disabilities
        Poverty
        School children
        Psychosocial factors
        Socioeconomic factors
        Confidence intervals
        Meta-analysis
        Research
        Systematic reviews
        At-risk people
      sug:
        subj:
          Anxiety
          Mental depression
          Students with disabilities
          High school students
          Learning disabilities
          Poverty
          School children
          Psychosocial factors
          Socioeconomic factors
          Confidence intervals
          Meta-analysis
          Research
          Systematic reviews
          At-risk people
      keyword:
        Depression
        Racialized minority group
        Socioeconomic status
        Youth
        Depression
        Racialized minority group
        Socioeconomic status
        Youth
      ab: This study explored the hypothesis that socioeconomically vulnerable children and adolescents who have learning disabilities (LDs) more prevalently experience anxiety and depression than their otherwise similar peers in elementary or high school who are not socioeconomically vulnerable. A systematic search found eight relevant surveys published between 2000 and 2019 that were synthesized with an exploratory meta-analysis. The overall sample-weighted synthesis found that 56% of students with LD scored higher on validated measures of anxiety and depression than did their typical peer without LD [d = 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04, 0.28]. In comparison, the sample-weighted synthesis among socioeconomically vulnerable students found that 74% of them with LD scored higher on anxiety and depression measures than did their typical peer without LD (d = 0.63, 95% CI 0.45, 0.81). This novel synthetic comparison supported the exploratory hypothesis that socioeconomically vulnerable children and adolescents with LD are at much greater risk of being anxious and depressed than are more socioeconomically resourceful students with LD. This review-generated finding, especially given the relatively modest database available for meta-analysis, is probably best considered a screened hypothesis for future primary research testing. Future research needs are discussed. Preliminary practical implications are also discussed.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N