Implementation of a decision aid for localized prostate cancer in routine care: A successful implementation strategy.

For the treatment choice of localized prostate cancer, effective patient decision aids have been developed. The implementation of decision aids in routine care, however, lags behind. Main known barriers are lack of confidence in the tool, lack of training on its use, lack of resources and lack of ti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Informatics Journal Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 1194 - 1208
Autores principales: van Tol-Geerdink, Julia J, van Oort, Inge M, Somford, Diederik M, Wijburg, Carl J, Geboers, Arno, van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F, de Vries, Marieke, Stalmeier, Peep FM
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Jun2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:For the treatment choice of localized prostate cancer, effective patient decision aids have been developed. The implementation of decision aids in routine care, however, lags behind. Main known barriers are lack of confidence in the tool, lack of training on its use, lack of resources and lack of time. A new implementation strategy addresses these barriers. Using this implementation strategy, the implementation rate of a decision aid was measured in eight hospitals and questionnaires were filled out by 24 care providers and 255 patients. The average implementation rate was 60 per cent (range 31%–100%). Hardly any barriers remained for care providers. Patients who did not use the decision aid appeared to be more unwilling than unable to use the decision aid. By addressing known barriers, that is, informing care providers on the effectiveness of the decision aid, providing instructions on its use, embedding it in the existing workflow and making it available free of charge, a successful implementation of a prostate cancer decision aid was reached.