Implementation of a decision aid for localized prostate cancer in routine care: A successful implementation strategy.
For the treatment choice of localized prostate cancer, effective patient decision aids have been developed. The implementation of decision aids in routine care, however, lags behind. Main known barriers are lack of confidence in the tool, lack of training on its use, lack of resources and lack of ti...
| Publicado en: | Health Informatics Journal Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 1194 - 1208 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Jun2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=144618484&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 144618484 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14604582 EJK jtl: Health Informatics Journal issn: 14604582 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2020 vid: 26 iid: 2 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 144618484 144618484 144618484 10.1177/1460458219873528 144618484 ppf: 1194 ppct: 14 formats: tig: atl: Implementation of a decision aid for localized prostate cancer in routine care: A successful implementation strategy. aug: au: van Tol-Geerdink, Julia J van Oort, Inge M Somford, Diederik M Wijburg, Carl J Geboers, Arno van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F de Vries, Marieke Stalmeier, Peep FM affil: Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands sug: subj: Prostatic Neoplasms Decision Support Techniques Implementation Science Oncologic Care Health Services Accessibility Professional Boundaries Human Male Middle Age Aged Questionnaires Program Implementation Statistics and Numerical Data Hospitals Decision Making, Shared Patient Preference Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Male ab: For the treatment choice of localized prostate cancer, effective patient decision aids have been developed. The implementation of decision aids in routine care, however, lags behind. Main known barriers are lack of confidence in the tool, lack of training on its use, lack of resources and lack of time. A new implementation strategy addresses these barriers. Using this implementation strategy, the implementation rate of a decision aid was measured in eight hospitals and questionnaires were filled out by 24 care providers and 255 patients. The average implementation rate was 60 per cent (range 31%–100%). Hardly any barriers remained for care providers. Patients who did not use the decision aid appeared to be more unwilling than unable to use the decision aid. By addressing known barriers, that is, informing care providers on the effectiveness of the decision aid, providing instructions on its use, embedding it in the existing workflow and making it available free of charge, a successful implementation of a prostate cancer decision aid was reached. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|