Correlated Trait–Correlated Method Minus One Analysis of the Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the Conners 3 Short Forms.

This study used the correlated trait–correlated method minus one model to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the scales of the Conners 3 Short [C 3 (S)]. The C 3 (S) scales in the analysis were inattention (IN), hyperactivity/impulsivity (HY), learning problems (LP; learning problem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Assessment Vol. 27; no. 7; pp. 1463 - 1476
Autores principales: Gomez, Rapson, Vance, Alasdair, Stavropoulos, Vasileios
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Oct2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:This study used the correlated trait–correlated method minus one model to examine the convergent and discriminant validity of the scales of the Conners 3 Short [C 3 (S)]. The C 3 (S) scales in the analysis were inattention (IN), hyperactivity/impulsivity (HY), learning problems (LP; learning problems/executive functioning from the teacher version), aggression (AG), and peer relations (PR, only for parent and teacher versions). A total of 529 adolescents and children (75% males, mean age = 11.75 years, SD = 2.97 years) provided self-ratings, and were also rated by their mothers and teachers. The findings indicated no support for the convergence of IN and HY across the three respondents. In contrast, there was convergence for LP, AG, and PR. There was support for the discriminant validity of the traits, except between IN and HY. The findings are discussed in relation to the convergent and discriminant validity of the C 3 (S) measures, and the clinical use of the C 3 (S).