Perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging in implementation science: a qualitative study.
Understanding barriers and facilitators to engaging with implementation science (IS) research can provide insight into how to improve efforts to encourage more researchers to participate in IS research. The study design used is a grounded theory qualitative study. We conducted semistructured telepho...
| Publicado en: | Public Health (Elsevier) Vol. 185; pp. 318 - 324 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
Aug2020
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=145265832&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 145265832 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00333506 18J0 jtl: Public Health (Elsevier) issn: 00333506 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2020 vid: 185 pid: 467 pub: Elsevier B.V. place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 145265832 145265832 145265832 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.016 145265832 ppf: 318 ppct: 6 formats: tig: atl: Perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging in implementation science: a qualitative study. aug: au: Stevens, E.R. Shelley, D. Boden-Albala, B. affil: Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA sug: subj: Implementation Science Motivation Research, Medical Collaboration Human Qualitative Studies Grounded Theory Semi-Structured Interview Thematic Analysis Surveys ab: Understanding barriers and facilitators to engaging with implementation science (IS) research can provide insight into how to improve efforts to encourage more researchers to participate in IS research. The study design used is a grounded theory qualitative study. We conducted semistructured telephone interviews with 20 health researchers familiar with IS that both report engaging in IS research and those that do not. We explored perceptions of barriers and facilitators to engaging in IS research. Themes surrounding difficulties defining IS, lack of training availability, and obstacles to forming research partnerships were discussed as barriers to engaging IS research. Interview topics were informed by the result of an online survey of health researchers in the US. Themes surrounding difficulties defining IS, lack of training availability, and obstacles to forming research partnerships were discussed as barriers to engaging IS research. While accessible mentorship, exposure to formative experiences that develop interest in IS research and an increasing IS visibility were described as motivators for engaging in IS research. These results highlight the importance of mentorship and exposure to IS ideas in motivating engagement in IS research and the presence of training and methodological barriers to engagement. Future research should expand this line of inquiry to include the perspectives of more junior researchers and students to better reflect the current IS environment. • Barrier and facilitator awareness can improve efforts to IS participation. • IS engagement across disciplines can improve the quality of IS research. • A qualitative study examining barriers and facilitators to IS engagement. • Exposure to IS ideas and mentorship encourage IS engagement. • Limited IS methods comprehension and feasibility act as barriers to IS engagement. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|