Subjective outcome evaluation of a service leadership subject: Findings based on university students in Hong Kong.
This study assessed the subjective outcome evaluation of a credit-bearing subject entitled "Service Leadership" in a university in Hong Kong. The samples included 64 and 74 students who took the subject offered in the regular semester (Semester 1) and intensive summer semester (Semester 3) in 2016-2...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Child Health & Human Development Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 247 - 258 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Jul-Sep2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=145928750&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 145928750 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 19395965 903J jtl: International Journal of Child Health & Human Development issn: 19395965 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul-Sep2019 vid: 12 iid: 3 pid: 1040 pub: Nova Science Publishers, Inc. place: Hauppauge, New York artinfo: ui: 145928750 145928750 145928750 145928750 ppf: 247 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Subjective outcome evaluation of a service leadership subject: Findings based on university students in Hong Kong. aug: au: Leung, Janet T. Y. Shek, Daniel T. L. affil: PhD, Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, PR China sug: subj: Students, College Hong Kong Leadership Evaluation Student Attitudes Evaluation Human Hong Kong Self Concept Emotions Confidence Hardiness ab: This study assessed the subjective outcome evaluation of a credit-bearing subject entitled "Service Leadership" in a university in Hong Kong. The samples included 64 and 74 students who took the subject offered in the regular semester (Semester 1) and intensive summer semester (Semester 3) in 2016-2017 academic year, respectively. Students' perceptions of the course content, instructor quality, benefits and global satisfaction of the subject were assessed at the end of the subject. Results indicated that majority of students had positive views toward course content, instructor quality, and benefits from the subject in enhancing their competencies in different aspects, such as social and emotional competence, self-confidence, resilience, and self-leadership. The two delivery modes (i.e., regular semester and intensive summer semester) also showed significant differences in the subjective outcomes, with the course conducted in regular term having higher scores than the course offered in summer term. As predicted, course content, instructor quality, and course benefits were inter-correlated significantly. While course content and instructor quality significantly predicted perceived subject benefits, course content and perceived benefits of the subject were significant predictors of students' global satisfaction. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|