Effectiveness of a decontamination procedure in a pharmacy buffer room contaminated by 5 antineoplastic agents.

Purpose Healthcare facilities are obligated to implement strategies to protect healthcare workers from exposure to hazardous drugs, including any real or potential risk from contaminated surfaces. Guidelines are broad and lack sufficient detail for healthcare facilities to establish clear effectiven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy Vol. 77; no. 24; pp. 2081 - 2089
Autores principales: Arpino, Paul, Yeomelakis, Jason, Oommen, Anisha
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA 12/15/2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose Healthcare facilities are obligated to implement strategies to protect healthcare workers from exposure to hazardous drugs, including any real or potential risk from contaminated surfaces. Guidelines are broad and lack sufficient detail for healthcare facilities to establish clear effectiveness targets for their decontamination procedures. Our goal in this analysis was to measure the effectiveness of a decontamination procedure in a pharmacy buffer room contaminated with 5 antineoplastic drugs. Methods Six rounds of contamination, decontamination, and wipe sampling were performed in a pharmacy buffer room designated for hazardous drug (HD) compounding. Ten locations in the buffer room were contaminated with 5-fluorouracil, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin. Pharmacy staff were blinded to contamination sites. After contamination, 3 pharmacy technicians following the same decontamination procedure decontaminated the buffer room. To assess the impact of decontamination, residual hazardous drug levels were assessed after contamination and after decontamination using a commercially available wipe sampling product. Results The mean (SD) residual contamination levels for the 239 wipe samples taken before and after decontamination were 63 (60) ng and 3.9 (8.2) ng, respectively, representing a 94% reduction in residual HD contamination. Residual contamination was not detectable (<5 ng) in 221 (~93%) of the samples after decontamination. Conclusion The employed decontamination procedures effectively reduced residual HD surface contamination.