Fragmentalism and Special Relativity.
In 2005 Kit Fine proposed a new interpretation of the special theory of relativity connected to his fragmentalist version of realism about tense. In (Hofweber and Lange 2017) we criticized Fine's fragmentalist interpretation of special relativity by arguing that it cannot explain why the Lorentz tra...
| Publicado en: | Teorema Vol. 39; no. 3; pp. 5 - 16 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Teorema
2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=147447901&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 147447901 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02101602 IHG jtl: Teorema issn: 02101602 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2020 vid: 39 iid: 3 pid: 20677 pub: Teorema artinfo: ui: 147447901 ppf: 5 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 924KB tig: atl: Fragmentalism and Special Relativity. aug: au: Hofweber, Thomas Lange, Marc affil: Department of Philosophy University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Caldwell Hall CB# 3125, 240 East Cameron Ave., Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3125, USA su: Special relativity (Physics) Lorentz transformations Relativity (Physics) Realism Minkowski geometry sug: subj: Special relativity (Physics) Lorentz transformations Relativity (Physics) Realism Minkowski geometry keyword: Explanation explicación Fragmentalism fragmentalismo Realism about Tense Realismo sobre el tiempo Special Theory of Relativity teoría especial de la relatividad explicación fragmentalismo Realismo sobre el tiempo teoría especial de la relatividad ab: In 2005 Kit Fine proposed a new interpretation of the special theory of relativity connected to his fragmentalist version of realism about tense. In (Hofweber and Lange 2017) we criticized Fine's fragmentalist interpretation of special relativity by arguing that it cannot explain why the Lorentz transformations hold between different fragments, whereas the standard Minkowskian interpretation can easily explain this. Martin Lipman defends the fragmentalist interpretation of special relativity against our objection in (Lipman 2020). In this article we elaborate on our argument against the fragmentalist interpretation of special relativity and respond to Lipman's criticism of our argument. En 2005, Kit Fine propuso una nueva interpretación de la teoría especial de la relatividad relacionada con su versión fragmentalista del realismo sobre el tiempo. En Hofweber and Lange (2017) criticamos la interpretación fragmentalista de la relatividad especial de Fine argumentando que no puede explicar por qué las transformaciones de Lorentz se mantienen entre diferentes fragmentos, mientras que la interpretación estándar minkowskiana puede explicar esto fácilmente. Martin Lipman defiende en Lipman (2020) la interpretación fragmentalista de la relatividad especial contra nuestra objeción. En este artículo elaboramos nuestro argumento en contra de la interpretación fragmentalista de la relatividad especial y respondemos a la crítica de Lipman a nuestro argumento. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Teorema is the property of Teorema and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Teorema holder: Teorema dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|