Performance Monitoring During Categorization With and Without Prior Knowledge: A Comparison of Confidence Calibration Indices With the Certainty Criterion.

Subjective confidence reports are used in numerous research paradigms to examine the extent to which participants are aware of their performance in a task. By examining the discrepancy between objective performance and subjective confidence ratings, inferences can be made about the conditions in whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale Vol. 74; no. 4; pp. 302 - 316
Autores principales: Schoenherr, Jordan Richard, Lacroix, Guy L.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Canadian Psychological Association Dec2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Subjective confidence reports are used in numerous research paradigms to examine the extent to which participants are aware of their performance in a task. By examining the discrepancy between objective performance and subjective confidence ratings, inferences can be made about the conditions in which participants have greater explicit knowledge of the representations and processes used to complete a task. In the current study, we examined the effects of prior knowledge on subjective assessments of performance using a categorisation task wherein lists of features that defined exemplars shared latent feature associations on the basis of prior knowledge or had no prior associations. Using 2 methods for computing confidence, we demonstrate the strengths and limitations of these measures of subjective awareness. Whereas our findings replicated the effect of prior knowledge on learning, our results challenge the role of explicit and implicit knowledge suggested by previous research using a similar paradigm.