Effectiveness of Modalities to Teach Evidence Based Medicine to Pediatric Clerkship Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

To evaluate the effectiveness of a traditional didactic session (TDS) as compared to a self-paced, interactive, multimedia module (SPM) on the application of evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills among medical students during their inpatient pediatric rotation. We conducted a randomized controlled tr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Academic Pediatrics Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 375 - 384
Autores principales: Hadvani, Teena, Dutta, Ankhi, Choy, Eric, Kumar, Shelley, Molleda, Carolina, Parikh, Vipul, Lopez, Michelle A., Lui, Karen, Ban, Kathryn, Wallace, Sowdhamini S.
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Mar2021
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:To evaluate the effectiveness of a traditional didactic session (TDS) as compared to a self-paced, interactive, multimedia module (SPM) on the application of evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills among medical students during their inpatient pediatric rotation. We conducted a randomized controlled trial from June, 2017 to June, 2018 at a quaternary care children's hospital. Students were randomized to TDS or SPM during each 2-week block. All students completed a critical appraisal tool (CAT) of evidence related to a clinical question in a standardized appraisal form and self-reflected about the EBM process. The primary outcome was the numeric score of the CAT derived by using the validated Fresno tool. Secondary outcomes of knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and self-reported behaviors related to EBM were measured using validated surveys. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test for CAT scores and mixed-model procedure (PROC MIXED), with subject as random effect and time as repeated measure for the secondary outcomes. One hundred twenty-seven clerkship students were included. Overall, there was no significant difference in mean CAT scores for TDS (n = 59) versus SPM (n = 66) groups (90.3 vs 92.0, P =.65). There were no significant differences between SPM and TDS groups for knowledge (P =.66), attitudes (P =.97), confidence (P =.55), and accessing evidence (P =.27). Both groups showed significant gains in knowledge, attitudes, confidence, and accessing evidence from baseline to postcourse. Improvements in knowledge and confidence were sustained at 3-months. A SPM learning module is as effective as a TDS module for application of EBM concepts and knowledge to patient care.