From Lollipops to Lidocaine: The Need for a Universal Print-to-Speech Framework.
Objective: There is a strong relationship between reading and articulation (Lervåg & Hulme, 2009; Pan et al., 2011). Given the tight coupling of these processes, innovative approaches are needed to understand the intricacies associated with print-speech connections. Here we ran a series of tightly c...
| Published in: | Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale Vol. 75; no. 3; pp. 279 - 299 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Canadian Psychological Association
Sep2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=152551626&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 152551626 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 11961961 CJX jtl: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale issn: 11961961 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2021 vid: 75 iid: 3 pid: 98 pub: Canadian Psychological Association artinfo: ui: 152551626 10.1037/cep0000257 ppf: 279 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.6MB tig: atl: From Lollipops to Lidocaine: The Need for a Universal Print-to-Speech Framework. aug: au: Cummine, Jacqueline Cullum, Angela Aalto, Daniel Sereda, Tyson Fleming, Cassidy Reed, Alesha Ostevik, Amberley Cashion-Dextrase, Sienna Jeffery, Caroline C. Hodgetts, William E. affil: Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta Institute for Reconstructive Science in Medicine, Covenant Health, Edmonton, Canada Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, University of Alberta Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta su: Task performance Randomized controlled trials Decision making Reading Lidocaine Speech perception Candy Phonological awareness Somatosensory evoked potentials Descriptive statistics Statistical models Mouth sug: subj: Task performance Randomized controlled trials Decision making Reading Confectionery Merchant Wholesalers Confectionery and Nut Stores Other specialty-line food merchant wholesalers Lidocaine Speech perception Candy Phonological awareness Somatosensory evoked potentials Descriptive statistics Statistical models Mouth keyword: feedback somatosensory perturbation speech word recognition locution perturbation somatosensorielle rétroaction reconnaissance des mots feedback somatosensory perturbation speech word recognition locution perturbation somatosensorielle rétroaction reconnaissance des mots ab: Objective: There is a strong relationship between reading and articulation (Lervåg & Hulme, 2009; Pan et al., 2011). Given the tight coupling of these processes, innovative approaches are needed to understand the intricacies associated with print-speech connections. Here we ran a series of tightly controlled experiments to examine the impact of mouth perturbations on silent reading. Method: We altered the mouth, via somatosensory feedback, in several ways: (a) a large lollipop in the mouth (E1), (b) a candy stick (bite bar) held horizontally between the teeth (E2), and (c) lidocaine that served to numb the mouth (E3). Three tasks were completed: (a) picture categorization, (b) "spell" lexical decision (Spell-LDT; "does the letter string spell a real word, yes or no?"), and (c) "sound" lexical decision (Sound-LDT; "does the letter string sound like a real word, yes or no?"). Participants (N = 97; E1 = 27; E2 = 32; E3 = 38) completed each of the tasks two times: once with a somatosensory perturbation (lollipop, bite bar, or lidocaine) and once without. Results: For each experiment, a linear mixed effects analysis was run. Overall, we found that the lollipop (E1) and lidocaine (E3) had some specific effects on word recognition (e.g., for "no" responses), particularly in the Spell-LDT, whereas the bite bar (E2) had no effect on word recognition. The picture categorization task was not impacted by any perturbations. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence that sensorimotor information is connected to reading. We discuss how these findings advance our understanding of a print-to-speech framework. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|