Are ABM explanations in the social sciences inevitably individualist?

Agent-based models (ABMs) are increasingly important in social science research. They have two obvious apparent virtues: they can model complex macrosociological phenomena without strong assumptions about agents and without analytic solutions for models, and they seem to instantiate the methodologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 200; no. 1; pp. 1 - 23
Autores principales: Kincaid, Harold, Zahle, Julie
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=155352140&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 155352140
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2022
      vid: 200
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        155352140
        10.1007/s11229-022-03465-9
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 320KB
      tig:
        atl: Are ABM explanations in the social sciences inevitably individualist?
      aug:
        au:
          Kincaid, Harold
          Zahle, Julie
        affil:
          School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, 7701, Rondebosch, South Africa
          Department of Philosophy, University of Bergen, Postboks 7805, 5020, Bergen, Norway
      sug:
      keyword:
        Agent-based modelling
        Explanation
        Methodological individualism
        Social sciences
      ab: Agent-based models (ABMs) are increasingly important in social science research. They have two obvious apparent virtues: they can model complex macrosociological phenomena without strong assumptions about agents and without analytic solutions for models, and they seem to instantiate the methodological individualist program in a concrete way. We argue that the latter claim is false. After providing schematic accounts of ABM models and a first introduction to ways in which to characterize individualist explanations, we work through six conceptions of individualist explanations that are decreasingly "less individualist" and argue that ABM-based explanations in the social sciences are not inevitably individualist in any of these senses. ABMs allow for explanatory relations among social entities and properties in the model environment and they are silent on what basic agents are, allowing social entities and properties to play basic explanatory roles.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2022. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N