Using a "think-aloud" process to aid co-design in development of a medicine information needs assessment tool.

Medicine administration is a key component of nursing practice that encompasses consumer education. However, the information a consumer considers important in their health journey is difficult to ascertain in a timely manner. This paper describes one part of a multi-stage project aiming to develop a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Online Journal of Nursing Informatics Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 7 - 8
Autores principales: Honey, M., Aspden, T., Brackley, K., Amende, H., French, A., Chan, A.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: HIMSS Foundation Winter2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Medicine administration is a key component of nursing practice that encompasses consumer education. However, the information a consumer considers important in their health journey is difficult to ascertain in a timely manner. This paper describes one part of a multi-stage project aiming to develop a new tool to assist nurses, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals to better meet the medicine information needs of consumers. The development of this questionnaire involved a multi-step co-design process. Here we report on our findings to the research question of "How can co-design be used in the development of a patient-reported outcomes tool?" Specifically, we report on the process of using a "think-aloud" process to aid co-design in the early testing and refining of the data collection tool (Medicines Information Needs for Individuals -- Questionnaire: MINI -Q). Several rounds of "think-aloud" interviews with consumers were used to determine the tool's acceptability for use, initially as a paper version and then as a digital version completed using a tablet device. Consumers (n=40), with an average of three medical conditions and taking six regular medicines, were interviewed. They identified 315 issues with the MINI -Q. Their suggestions included clearer wording, reduced length, simplified sentence structure, changed formatting, type of response options, and additional information to collect. The "think-aloud" technique was helpful to improve the usability and acceptability of the tool. The next stage is to test the final version with a larger sample to determine acceptability and face validity.