Using a "think-aloud" process to aid co-design in development of a medicine information needs assessment tool.
Medicine administration is a key component of nursing practice that encompasses consumer education. However, the information a consumer considers important in their health journey is difficult to ascertain in a timely manner. This paper describes one part of a multi-stage project aiming to develop a...
| Publicado en: | Online Journal of Nursing Informatics Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 7 - 8 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
HIMSS Foundation
Winter2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=156117188&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 156117188 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10899758 Z2C jtl: Online Journal of Nursing Informatics issn: 10899758 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Winter2022 vid: 26 iid: 1 pid: 28397 pub: HIMSS Foundation place: Kittanning, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 156117188 156117188 156117188 156117188 ppf: 7 ppct: 1 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: T tig: atl: Using a "think-aloud" process to aid co-design in development of a medicine information needs assessment tool. aug: au: Honey, M. Aspden, T. Brackley, K. Amende, H. French, A. Chan, A. sug: subj: Information Needs Needs Assessment Drug Administration Instrument Construction Instrument Validation Questionnaires Evaluation Human Interviews Young Adult Adult Middle Age Aged Purposive Sample Usability Study Audiorecording Female Male Aged, 80 and Over Validation Studies Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Aged, 80 & over Female Male ab: Medicine administration is a key component of nursing practice that encompasses consumer education. However, the information a consumer considers important in their health journey is difficult to ascertain in a timely manner. This paper describes one part of a multi-stage project aiming to develop a new tool to assist nurses, pharmacists and other healthcare professionals to better meet the medicine information needs of consumers. The development of this questionnaire involved a multi-step co-design process. Here we report on our findings to the research question of "How can co-design be used in the development of a patient-reported outcomes tool?" Specifically, we report on the process of using a "think-aloud" process to aid co-design in the early testing and refining of the data collection tool (Medicines Information Needs for Individuals -- Questionnaire: MINI -Q). Several rounds of "think-aloud" interviews with consumers were used to determine the tool's acceptability for use, initially as a paper version and then as a digital version completed using a tablet device. Consumers (n=40), with an average of three medical conditions and taking six regular medicines, were interviewed. They identified 315 issues with the MINI -Q. Their suggestions included clearer wording, reduced length, simplified sentence structure, changed formatting, type of response options, and additional information to collect. The "think-aloud" technique was helpful to improve the usability and acceptability of the tool. The next stage is to test the final version with a larger sample to determine acceptability and face validity. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|