The Demand for Insurance and Rationale for a Mandate: Evidence from Workers' Compensation Insurance.

Workers' compensation insurance, which provides no-fault coverage for work-related injuries, is mandatory in nearly all states. We use administrative data from a unique market without a coverage mandate to estimate the demand for workers' compensation insurance, leveraging regulatory premium updates...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Economic Review Vol. 112; no. 5; pp. 1621 - 1669
Autores principales: Cabral, Marika, Cui, Can, Dworsky, Michael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Economic Association May2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Workers' compensation insurance, which provides no-fault coverage for work-related injuries, is mandatory in nearly all states. We use administrative data from a unique market without a coverage mandate to estimate the demand for workers' compensation insurance, leveraging regulatory premium updates for identification. We find that a 1 percent increase in premiums leads to approximately a 0.3 percent decline in coverage. Drawing upon these estimates and data on costs, we examine potential justifications for government intervention to increase coverage. This analysis suggests that several forms of market failure—such as adverse selection, market power, and externalities—may not justify a mandate in this setting. (JEL G22, G52, J28, K13, K31)