Does group size matter during collaborative skills learning? A randomised study.

Background: Collaborative skills learning in the form of dyad learning compared with individual learning has been shown to lead to non‐inferior skills retention and transfer. However, we have limited knowledge on which learning activities improve collaborative skills training and how the number of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Education Vol. 56; no. 6; pp. 680 - 690
Autores principales: Noerholk, Laerke Marijke, Morcke, Anne Mette, Kulasegaram, Kulamakan, Nørgaard, Lone N., Harmsen, Lotte, Andreasen, Lisbeth Anita, Pedersen, Nina Gros, Johnsson, Vilma, Vamadevan, Anishan, Tolsgaard, Martin Grønnebæk
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=157152452&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 157152452
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03080110
        ESF
      jtl: Medical Education
      issn: 03080110
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2022
      vid: 56
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157152452
        155788962
        157152452
        157152452
        10.1111/medu.14791
        157152452
      ppf: 680
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Does group size matter during collaborative skills learning? A randomised study.
      aug:
        au:
          Noerholk, Laerke Marijke
          Morcke, Anne Mette
          Kulasegaram, Kulamakan
          Nørgaard, Lone N.
          Harmsen, Lotte
          Andreasen, Lisbeth Anita
          Pedersen, Nina Gros
          Johnsson, Vilma
          Vamadevan, Anishan
          Tolsgaard, Martin Grønnebæk
        affil: Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation (CAMES), Copenhagen University Hospital ‐ Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
      sug:
        subj:
          Skill Acquisition
          Collaboration
          Human
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Random Assignment
          Descriptive Statistics
          Scales
      ab: Background: Collaborative skills learning in the form of dyad learning compared with individual learning has been shown to lead to non‐inferior skills retention and transfer. However, we have limited knowledge on which learning activities improve collaborative skills training and how the number of collaborators may impact skills transfer. We explored the effects of skills training individually, in dyads, triads or tetrads on learning activities during training and on subsequent skills transfer. Methods: In a randomised, controlled study, participants completed a pre‐post‐transfer‐test set‐up in groups of one to four. Participants completed 2 hours of obstetric ultrasound training. In the dyad, triad and tetrad group participants took turns actively handling the ultrasound probe. All performances were rated by two blinded experts using the Objective Structured Assessment of Ultrasound Skills (OSAUS) scale and a Global Rating Scale (GRS). All training was video recorded, and learning activities were analysed using the Interactive‐Constructive‐Active‐Passive (ICAP) framework. Results: One hundred one participants completed the simulation‐based training, and ninety‐seven completed the transfer test. Performance scores improved significantly from pre‐ to post‐test for all groups (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.55). However, group size did not affect transfer test performance on OSAUS scores (p = 0.13, ηp2 = 0.06) or GRS scores (p = 0.23, ηp2 = 0.05). ICAP analyses of training activities showed that time spent on non‐learning and passive learning activities increased with group size (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.31), whereas time spent on constructive and interactive learning activities was constant between groups compared with singles (p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.72). Conclusion: Collaborative skills learning in groups of up to four did not impair skills transfer despite less hands‐on time. This may be explained by a compensatory shift towards constructive and interactive learning activities that outweigh the effect of shorter hands‐on time. Collaborative skills learning in group sizes of up to four participants is reported in this work to not impair skills transfer despite individual trainees having less hands‐on time.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N