Augmented reality technology in language learning: A meta‐analysis.
Background: As a recently emerging innovative technology, augmented reality (AR) has become a popular tool for language learning. However, to date, very few meta‐analytical studies has been conducted on AR in this field to understand its effectiveness on language learning. Objectives: This meta‐anal...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 929 - 946 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | equations & formulas research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Aug2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=157845802&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 157845802 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02664909 6M1 jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning issn: 02664909 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2022 vid: 38 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 157845802 155592362 157845802 157845802 10.1111/jcal.12661 157845802 ppf: 929 ppct: 17 formats: tig: atl: Augmented reality technology in language learning: A meta‐analysis. aug: au: Cai, Ying Pan, Zilong Liu, Min affil: Department of Curriculum & Instruction, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA sug: subj: Augmented Reality Utilization Language Development Learning Methods Motivation Students, Elementary Human Systematic Review Meta Analysis Teaching Methods Educational Status ERIC Database ab: Background: As a recently emerging innovative technology, augmented reality (AR) has become a popular tool for language learning. However, to date, very few meta‐analytical studies has been conducted on AR in this field to understand its effectiveness on language learning. Objectives: This meta‐analysis was conducted to systematically synthesize the findings from primary studies published between 2008 and 2020 to establish the effects of AR on language learning gains and students' motivation. Methods: The 21 studies met all the inclusion criteria were included in the meta‐analysis to extract effect size statistics. The robust variance estimation (RVE) technique using the "Robumeta" R‐package was adopted to estimate the pooled effect size. Given the heterogeneity of the effect sizes, a mixed‐effects meta‐regression model was estimated to examine any association between the effectiveness of AR technologies and moderator variables. Results and conclusion: The pooled effect‐size estimate was 0.93 for language gains and 0.42 for motivation, which indicates that AR applications have a large effect on learners' language gains and a small to medium effect on learners' motivation. The moderator analysis results suggested that learners' educational levels and intervention durations are significant moderating factors that impact the effect of AR on learners' motivation. In particular, elementary school students in this meta‐analysis study experienced a large measurable effect in terms of both language gains and motivation. Additionally, exposure to AR applications for up to 1 week is especially effective for enhancing learners' motivation. Major takeaways: The findings of this meta‐analysis study demonstrated how AR applications can be utilized in language teaching and learning contexts, and how language educators could adopt AR technologies in classrooms to promote learners' language gains and motivation. Lay Description: What is currently known?The advantages of augmented reality (AR) in education include learning gains and motivation improvementsAR applications can create an immersive environment for language learners and enrich the teaching and learning processesAR use should be connected to pedagogical theories and instructional strategies.What this paper adds?The specific effects of AR applications in language learning gains and students' motivationAn investigation into which moderator variables impact language learning when using AR applicationsImplications for practice:Language instructors might consider applying AR over a short period or as supplementary material to stimulate learning and motivation. However, when using AR applications for long‐term teaching practices (for example, over a month), instructors should consider adopting additional pedagogical or learning strategies.Language instructors may consider adopting AR as an effective tool for vocabulary teaching, particularly for elementary school learners.In language classes, AR applications should not be restricted to a specific instructional strategy only but be used diversely.The adoption of AR techniques in the language classroom should not be limited to mobile devices. Language instructors, particularly those who have limited access to mobile devices, are also encouraged to apply alternative AR technologies, such as computer‐based technologies, into their teaching. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|